User Tools

Site Tools


seminars:arit

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

seminars:arit [2024/04/14 09:38]
borisov
seminars:arit [2024/04/18 12:46] (current)
borisov
Line 55: Line 55:
    * **April 9** 4:00-6:00 pm Special Event: PhD Defense \\    **//​Speaker//​**:​ Sayak Sengupta (Binghamton) \\      **//​Title//​**: ​ Iteration of Polynomials over Integers ​ \\ **//​Abstract//​**:​ For a polynomial $u=u(x)$ over $\mathbb Z$ and $r\in\mathbb Z$, we consider the orbit of $u$ at $r$, denoted and defined by $\mathcal{O}_u(r):​=\{u(r),​u(u(r)),​\ldots\}$. There are two main questions that we plan to answer: (1) what are the polynomials $u$ for which $0\in \mathcal{O}_u(r)$,​ and (2) what are the integer polynomials $u$ that satisfies the condition that for each prime number $p$ there is some iteration $m_p$ of $u$ such that $p|u^{(m_p)}(r)$?​ In this talk we will provide partial answer to (1), and a complete answer to (2). \\    * **April 9** 4:00-6:00 pm Special Event: PhD Defense \\    **//​Speaker//​**:​ Sayak Sengupta (Binghamton) \\      **//​Title//​**: ​ Iteration of Polynomials over Integers ​ \\ **//​Abstract//​**:​ For a polynomial $u=u(x)$ over $\mathbb Z$ and $r\in\mathbb Z$, we consider the orbit of $u$ at $r$, denoted and defined by $\mathcal{O}_u(r):​=\{u(r),​u(u(r)),​\ldots\}$. There are two main questions that we plan to answer: (1) what are the polynomials $u$ for which $0\in \mathcal{O}_u(r)$,​ and (2) what are the integer polynomials $u$ that satisfies the condition that for each prime number $p$ there is some iteration $m_p$ of $u$ such that $p|u^{(m_p)}(r)$?​ In this talk we will provide partial answer to (1), and a complete answer to (2). \\
  
-   * **April 16** \\    **//​Speaker//​**:​ Alexander Borisov (Binghamton) \\      **//​Title//​**:​ On the Nyman-Beurling -Baez-Duarte criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis ​    \\ **//​Abstract//​**:​ I will talk about an attractive criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis, originally due to Nyman and Beurling in 1950s and strengthened by Baez-Duarte in early 2000s. The talk will be partially based on my 2005 paper https://​people.math.binghamton.edu/​borisov/​documents/​papers/​quot-fact-rh.pdf and will also include some more recent unpublished considerations. \\+   * **April 16** \\    **//​Speaker//​**:​ Alexander Borisov (Binghamton) \\      **//​Title//​**:​ On the Nyman-Beurling-Baez-Duarte criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis ​    \\ **//​Abstract//​**:​ I will talk about an attractive criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis, originally due to Nyman and Beurling in early 1950s and strengthened by Baez-Duarte in early 2000s. The talk will be partially based on my 2005 paper https://​people.math.binghamton.edu/​borisov/​documents/​papers/​quot-fact-rh.pdf and will also include some more recent unpublished considerations. \\
  
-   * **April ​30** Special event: ​Comprehensive for Mithun Veettil (tentative)\\    **//​Speaker//​**:​ Mithun Veettil \\      **//​Title//​**: ​TBA      ​\\ **//​Abstract//​**: ​TBA \\+   * **April ​29 (Monday)** 4:00-6:00 pm Special event: ​ ​Admission to candidacy ​\\    **//​Speaker//​**:​ Mithun Veettil ​(Binghamton) ​\\  ​**//​Talk 1//** (4:​00-4:​55)\\  ​**//​Title//​**: ​Hilbert'​s Irreducibility Theorem ​  \\ **//​Abstract//​**: ​Hilbert'​s irreducibility theorem deals with the following problem: Let $f(t,x)$ be an irreducible polynomial in $K[t,x]$. Then for which field $K$ is it true that there are infinitely many specializations $t\mapsto t_0\in K$ such that $f(t_0,x)$ is irreducible in $K[x]$? Surprisingly,​ it turns out that $\mathbb{Q}$ and function fields have this property. \\ **//Talk 2//** (5:​00-5:​55)\\ ​ **//​Title//​**:​ Golomb Topology on a Domain ​  \\ **//​Abstract//​**:​ Golomb topology on a domain is a generalization of arithmetic topology on $\mathbb{Z}^+,​$ appearing in Furstenberg'​s proof of the infinitude of primes. This paves way for the otherwise rare examples of countably infinite connected Hausdorff spaces. Following this, I shall conclude with a homeomorphism problem of Golomb topology on Dedekind domains. This talk is based on the 2019 paper by Pete Clark, Noah Lebowitz-Lockard,​ and Paul Pollack http://​alpha.math.uga.edu/​~pete/​CLLP_November_30_2017.pdf ​\\
  
  
  
seminars/arit.1713101913.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/14 09:38 by borisov